Designing an Automated Mixing and Dosing System with Siemens TIA Portal

Designing an Automated Mixing and Dosing System with Siemens TIA Portal

Strategic System Initialization and Safety Interlocks

The process begins with a robust initialization phase to ensure operational safety. The system uses a SYSTEM_ON memory bit (M0.0) to control the main power state. This bit only activates if the weighing indicator (MW2) reads zero, confirming the tank is empty.

A start button (I0.0) triggers the latching logic, while a stop button (I0.1) or process completion signal resets it. This interlocking mechanism is a standard best practice in control systems to prevent accidental restarts during maintenance or when the tank is partially full.

Implementing Precision Weight-Based Dosing

The first phase of the recipe involves adding two primary materials based on precise mass measurements. This approach is superior to volume-based methods because it accounts for density fluctuations in raw materials.

  • Material A (Valve Q0.0): Opens when the system starts and remains active until the scale reaches 8 kg.

  • Material B (Valve Q0.1): Activates immediately after Material A, filling the tank until the total weight reaches 12 kg.

Using Siemens PLC comparator instructions (Less Than, Greater Than or Equal) ensures the transitions between stages are seamless and accurate.

Integrating Time-Based Logic for Secondary Materials

While primary ingredients rely on weight, secondary additives often use time-based dosing for simplicity or when flow rates are constant. In this system, Material C is introduced via Valve Q0.2 for exactly 2 seconds once the weight targets are met.

The Agitator (Q0.4) also engages during this stage. In my experience, starting the mixer early helps prevent material clumping, which is critical for achieving a homogenous blend in chemical or food processing applications.

Thermal Processing and Temperature Control Cycles

After the initial dosing, the mixture must undergo a specific temperature profile. The system activates a Heater (Q0.5) for a 12-second duration. This timed heat cycle is often used in industrial automation where specific chemical reactions or viscosity changes are required.

Following the heating phase, Material D (Valve Q0.3) is added for another 12 seconds. To stabilize the product, a cooling fan (Q0.6) operates for a final 12-second cycle. These sequential timers ensure that each batch receives identical thermal treatment, maintaining high product consistency.

Process Completion and Alarm Management

Efficiency in factory automation requires clear operator feedback. Once the cooling cycle ends, an alarm (Q0.7) notifies the operator that the batch is ready. This alarm uses latching logic and stays active until manually acknowledged via a stop button (I0.2).

Notably, the discharge process remains manual. The outlet valve (Q1.0) only opens when the operator presses a dedicated button, providing a final layer of human oversight before the product moves to the next stage of production.

Show All
Blog posts
Show All
Unleashing Potential: How Collaborative Robots are Revolutionizing Industrial Automation

Unleashing Potential: How Collaborative Robots are Revolutionizing Industrial Automation

The landscape of industrial automation is undergoing a seismic shift. Recent data from IDTechEx projects that collaborative robot (cobot) revenues will soar from $1.2 billion to nearly $30 billion within a decade. This growth signifies a move away from rigid, isolated machinery toward flexible, human-centric systems. Manufacturers now face a pivotal moment to integrate these versatile tools into their existing control systems.

Master Coordinated Motion: Synchronizing Multi-Axis Servo Systems

Master Coordinated Motion: Synchronizing Multi-Axis Servo Systems

In the world of industrial automation, moving a single motor is straightforward. However, coordinating three or more axes to work as one unit requires advanced control strategies. Whether you are building a custom gantry or an articulated robot, coordinated motion simplifies complex spatial calculations. This technology allows multiple joints to reach their destination simultaneously, ensuring smooth and predictable machine paths.

Operator Intervention in Functional Safety: Balancing Human Agency and System Integrity

Operator Intervention in Functional Safety: Balancing Human Agency and System Integrity

In modern process plants, the interaction between human operators and automated control systems defines the safety landscape. While digital systems like PLC and DCS technologies handle routine tasks, human operators provide the flexibility needed for complex decision-making. However, integrating human action into functional safety requires a rigorous understanding of when an operator serves as a risk factor or a protective barrier.