ข่าวสาร result Functional Safety

Bypassing Triconex and HIMA Safety Inputs Without Breaking SIL Integrity
Weifeng Han

Bypassing Triconex and HIMA Safety Inputs Without Breaking S...

A field playbook for temporary override logic, HART diagnostics, and management-of-change discipline on SIL3 logic solvers like Triconex and HIMA.
Bypassing a Safety Function Without Breaking IEC 61511: A Triconex and HIMA Field Guide
Chen Weiming

Bypassing a Safety Function Without Breaking IEC 61511: A Tr...

Learn how to interrupt a protection signal, control operational risk, and safely restore SIS loops under IEC 61511 using Triconex and HIMA architectures.
Safety PLC Trips on Nothing: Designing a SIS That Survives Common Cause Failure
Deng Weiguang

Safety PLC Trips on Nothing: Designing a SIS That Survives C...

Learn how to eliminate Common Cause Failures (CCF) in Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS). Audit Triconex and HIMA safety architectures, calculate the IEC 61511 beta factor, and ensure true BPCS independence.
SIL 3 Proof Test Scheduling and PFDavg Management for HIMA HIMatrix and ICS Triplex TMR

SIL 3 Proof Test Scheduling and PFDavg Management for HIMA H...

A practical IEC 61511 guide to scheduling SIL 3 proof tests, calculating PFDavg for HIMA HIMatrix F60 and ICS Triplex TMR architectures, applying partial proof test credit, and maintaining compliance records across multi-year plant turnaround cycles.
Honeywell Safety Manager SC SIL 2 Proof Test Execution: IEC 61511 Compliance and HIMA Comparison

Honeywell Safety Manager SC SIL 2 Proof Test Execution: IEC ...

A complete field procedure for planning, executing, and documenting SIL 2 proof tests on Honeywell Safety Manager SC — with PFDavg verification, partial stroke valve testing, HIMA HIMatrix cross-reference, and IEC 61511 Phase 2 audit-ready documentation practices.
Operator Intervention in Functional Safety: Balancing Human Agency and System Integrity
plcdcspro

Operator Intervention in Functional Safety: Balancing Human ...

In modern process plants, the interaction between human operators and automated control systems defines the safety landscape. While digital systems like PLC and DCS technologies handle routine tasks, human operators provide the flexibility needed for complex decision-making. However, integrating human action into functional safety requires a rigorous understanding of when an operator serves as a risk factor or a protective barrier.